Analisis Faktor Profesionalisme Auditor Internal Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan pada Inspektorat Kabupaten Cirebon

Authors

  • Adie Irwan Kusumah

Keywords:

professionalism, quality report

Abstract

Good governance can be realized through effective internal control, as a result of the implementation of financial accountability. Internal control can effectively provide reasonable assurance on adherence, and effectiveness, efficiency and effectiveness in achieving the purpose of the duties and functions of Government Agencies (assurance activities) can give early warning (early warning system) and the effectiveness of risk management in the implementation of the tasks and functions of Government Agencies (anti-corruption activities); and to maintain and improve governance in the implementation of tasks and functions of Government Agencies (consulting activities). The sampling technique used in this study is saturated or census sample is numbered 69 respondents. Data collection technique is to use literature study, observation, questionnaire and documentation study. Analysis of the data on the influence of the independent variables are the professionalism of internal auditors with the dependent variable quality of the internal auditor's report. The results showed that the factors of the professionalism of internal auditors to improve the quality of examination reports of internal auditors in Inspectorate Cirebon including the factor of independence, professional ability factor, the factor of the scope of work, and the internal audit section management factor.

References

Agoes, Sukrisno. (2004). Auditing: pemeriksaan akuntan, edisi 3. Jakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
Akmal. (2009). Pemeriksaan manajemen internal audit. Jakarta: Indeks.
Arens, A. A,. & Loebbecke, J. K. (2003). Auditing pendekatan terpadu, Edisi Revisi. Dialih bahasakan oleh Amir Abadi Jusuf. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Courtemanche, Gill. (1997). The new internal auditing. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Hery. (2010). Cetakan Kesatu. Potret profesi audit internal. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2011). Standar profesional akuntan publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Indriantoro, N., & Supomo, B. (2002). Metodologi penelitian bisnis untuk akuntansi dan manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Konsorsium Organisasi Profesi Audit Internal. (2004). Standar profesi audit internal. Jakarta: Yayasan Pendidikan Internal Audit.
Kumaat, V. G. (2011). Internal audit. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Nazir, Muhammad. (2003). Metode penelitian. Cetakan Kelima. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Riduwan. (2003). Dasar-dasar statistika. Cetakan ketiga. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Siegel, Sidney. (1997). Statistik non parametik untuk ilmu-ilmu sosial. Jakarta: Penerbit Gramedia.
Sugiyono. (2009). Metode penelitian bisnis. Bandung: CV ALVABETA.
-------------. (2011). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Supangat, Andi. (2005). Statistika untuk ekonomi dan bisnis. Bandung: Penerbit Pustaka.
Tugiman, Hiro. (1997). Standar profesional audit internal. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
-------------------. (2003). Standar profesional audit internal. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
-------------------. (2006). Standar profesional audit internal. Bandung: Kanisius.
--------------------. (2007). Pimpinan organisasi wajib memahami pengendalian manajemen dan etika. Jakarta: Yayasan Pendidikan Internal Audit.
The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation. (2009). International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF) The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation 247 Maitland Avenue Altamonte Springs, FL 32701-4201. USA.

Published

2015-09-01

Issue

Section

Articles in JBIMA (Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen) Vol. 3 No. 2