Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Terjadinya Intensi Turnover Pada Karyawan PT BAN Indonesia
Keywords:
group cohesiveness, job stress, job satisfaction, turnover intentionAbstract
The purpose of this study was intended to find answers to the problems potentially increasing turnover intention in PT BAN Indonesia, which is associated with the issue of group cohesiveness, job stress, and job satisfaction. The results showed that the group cohesiveness variable (X1) and job satisfaction variables (X3) negatively affect the level of turnover intention, with the t value of -3.865 X1 and X2 at -4.285. Variable Work Stress (X2) has positive influence on the level of turnover intention with the t value X2 by 5,423.
References
Beer, T. A., & Newman, J. E. (1978). Job shess, employee health and organizational effectiveness: A facet analysis, model and literature review personnel psychology.
Forsyth, D. R. (1999). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). New York: Brookes/ColeWadsworth.
Grant, K., Cravens, D. W., Low, G. S., & Moncrief, W. C. (2001). The role of satisfaction with territory design on the motivation, attitudes, and work outcomes of salespeople. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29 (2), 165-178.
Greenberg, J. (2005). Managing behavior in organizations. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hall, K., & Savery, L. K. (1986). Authority with strings attached put managers under severe pressure. Harvard Business Review, 160-164.
Handoko, T. H. (1997). Manajemen personalia dan sumber daya manusia. Yogyakarta: Lerety.
Hellriegell, D., & Slocum Jr., J. W. (2004). Organizational behavior. 10th edition. Ohio: Thomson South Eastern.
Kadiman. (2012). Pengaruh budaya organisasi, komitmen organisasi, dan kepuasan tenaga kerja terhadap turnover intention karyawan.
Luthans, F. (2006). Perilaku organisasi. Edisi 10. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
McShane, S. L., & Glinow, M. A. V. (2003). Organizational behavior. 2nd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nasarudin, A. M., Ramayah, T., & Kumaresan, S. (2005). Organizational stressors and job stress among managers: The moderating role of neuroticiem Singapore. Management review, 27 (2), 63-79.
Robbins, S. (2001). Perilaku organisasi (organizatonal behaviour). Jakarta: PT Prenhalindo.
Sutrisno, E. (2010). Mengenal sumber daya manusia. Jakarta: Prenada Media Griya.
Forsyth, D. R. (1999). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). New York: Brookes/ColeWadsworth.
Grant, K., Cravens, D. W., Low, G. S., & Moncrief, W. C. (2001). The role of satisfaction with territory design on the motivation, attitudes, and work outcomes of salespeople. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29 (2), 165-178.
Greenberg, J. (2005). Managing behavior in organizations. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hall, K., & Savery, L. K. (1986). Authority with strings attached put managers under severe pressure. Harvard Business Review, 160-164.
Handoko, T. H. (1997). Manajemen personalia dan sumber daya manusia. Yogyakarta: Lerety.
Hellriegell, D., & Slocum Jr., J. W. (2004). Organizational behavior. 10th edition. Ohio: Thomson South Eastern.
Kadiman. (2012). Pengaruh budaya organisasi, komitmen organisasi, dan kepuasan tenaga kerja terhadap turnover intention karyawan.
Luthans, F. (2006). Perilaku organisasi. Edisi 10. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
McShane, S. L., & Glinow, M. A. V. (2003). Organizational behavior. 2nd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nasarudin, A. M., Ramayah, T., & Kumaresan, S. (2005). Organizational stressors and job stress among managers: The moderating role of neuroticiem Singapore. Management review, 27 (2), 63-79.
Robbins, S. (2001). Perilaku organisasi (organizatonal behaviour). Jakarta: PT Prenhalindo.
Sutrisno, E. (2010). Mengenal sumber daya manusia. Jakarta: Prenada Media Griya.
Downloads
Published
2016-03-01
Issue
Section
Articles in JBIMA (Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen) Vol. 4 No. 1
